Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04260 12
Original file (04260 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
Sire,
Panel

PNT
. 2) ape

     
 

  
 
 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

  

JET
Docket No. 4260-12

26 Nov 12

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 November 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 7 Jun Ley

a copy of which is attached.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it ig important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No. 4260-12

naval record, the burden i

existence of probable material error or 1

Sincerely,

DAVID JJ. CASH
Hea y Section

Acting

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05347-02

    Original file (05347-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b) the decision to enroll/disenroll in the MGIB Program is irrevocable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04826-02

    Original file (04826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06490-08

    Original file (06490-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memo 1780 BUPERS~-262G of 4 Aug 08, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05018-08

    Original file (05018-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5018-08 25 Aug 08 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2008. Recommend denial Of Pay request to enroll in th Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) P¥ogram.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02324-01

    Original file (02324-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 dated 30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02

    Original file (02563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02199-02

    Original file (02199-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the Board considered the advisory 30 May 2002, a copy of which of‘ is conscientious consideration of ‘ the entire recortl, the Board found that the est:tblish the existence of probable material error or After careful and evidence submitted injustice. The names and votes of ot’ your It is regretted that the circumstances You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. request to enroll in the eview of cord indicates...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06617-01

    Original file (06617-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with applicable statutes, opinion attached. The program when he entered active duty (other than ember 1977 was the Veterans Educational Recommend in an educational education benefit entry onto active available to for training) Assistance Program to members who entered the military for the first time between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985. enrollments on 30 June 1985, 28 October 1986 to 31 March 1987. before these deadlines lost their eligibility. b. states he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02692-02

    Original file (02692-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I’EKS-604 tlic Board considered the advisory of‘ 24 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N A VY PERSONNEL C OMM AN D 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02220-02

    Original file (02220-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of ; entry onto active duty in 1980, it would have been impossible for him to have been counseled an education assistance program that didn't exist until 1985. no one could have enrollment period, requirements of the VEAP to Montgomery GI Bill conversion opportunities that didn't...